You may be only just now waking up to the news that the so-called “climate change” caused flooding of Britain in the winter of 2014 was actually the result of EU policies to deliberately create wetlands in the UK. For some, it’s been a little bit like that moment when you discovered that Father Christmas was actually your Dad. Then to have to go on to find out that these EU directives are being driven by something deeply sinister, known as UN Agenda 21, may be more than some can take. If so, please don’t worry. Leave it all for now, but bookmark this page first. You can return later, hopefully with a nice of mug of tea and a chocolate biscuit, when you’re ready to take on more.
I first started researching about UN Agenda 21 a couple of years ago. I came to the view, then, that it was about nothing more or less than a blueprint for global slavery, and I haven’t changed my mind since. In fact, I can see it now being played out in front of my eyes in my own life, like a car crash in slow motion.
I’ll begin with a metaphor, to help make something quite complex easier to understand, and it goes something like this:
The thousand-headed serpent
The Ramayana is an ancient and even today, extremely popular myth of the Indian people which contains great tales of derring-do by its heroes – the Sun god, Rama, and the monkey god, Hanuman. Like all myths, Vedic stories are metaphors for deeper philosophical teachings, but it is the battle scene between the Sun god Rama and the evil serpent Ravana that I want to highlight here.
During the first few hours of pitched battle, Rama is losing badly. This is because Ravana has more than a thousand heads, and every time one of Rama’s arrows slices off one of Ravana’s heads, another grows in its place.
The battle continues for hours and hours, and then days and days. Rama is becoming exhausted and in danger of losing the battle. But eventually, he is given wise counsel by a shaman. The shaman tells Rama that he has to hit Ravana in his ‘nectar pot’, which is just below the navel. So when Rama fires his arrow in that direction, and it hits Ravana’s nectar pot, the thousand-headed serpent falls instantly dead to the ground.
In this metaphor, the thousand-headed serpent Ravana represents the United Nations programme, Agenda 21/30/50. The heads that keep growing back again are all the different planks of the implementation of this program ~ and they include AI and 5G technology, geoengineering (chemtrails), HAARP, genetically modified foods, the man-made global warming scam, fracking, biological terrorism, atmospheric terrorism and financial terrorism.
All of these programs solely exist as various planks to support Agenda 21/30/50. So it’s a complete waste of time trying to deal with each of them, individually. In any case, our government-run media has an unending supply of talking heads to role out and tie up the real scientists with fake science and contrived computer modelling scenarios.
Similarly, our governments feel totally justified in continuing to try to convince ordinary people that geo-engineering (chemtrails) is needed to protect us from global warming. They also insist that genetically-modified foods are needed to feed the “population explosion” when they have patently never cared about the world’s starving millions of Africa before, otherwise why inflict on them such restrictive trade barriers and march into their countries and strip them of all their assets?
Added to that, even the UN’s own conservative demographic models show that the world’s population will level off by 2050, by which time, these Swamp creatures intend to own everyone and everything on the whole planet. The sole purpose of Agenda 21/30/50 is to remove our property rights and to drive us back into a feudal system, which is a euphemism for slavery; all the land will be owned by the United Nations and administered by its own appointed committees under contract law, or Marine Law.
In short, we will have to pay to live on this Earth.
The global commons
The official report of the UN-funded Commission on Global Governance, Our Global Neighborhood, calls for placing “the global commons” under the direct authority of the UN Trusteeship Council. It defines the “global commons” as:
“The atmosphere, outer space, the oceans beyond national jurisdiction and the related environment and life-support systems that contribute to the support of human life.”
Moreover, the UN Trusteeship Council is elected from “civil society” representatives. The Commission on Global Governance has created a “Petitions Council” to receive petitions from “Stakeholder Councils” in each nation for the purpose of directing the petitions to the correct UN agency for resolution and enforcement actions.
(Read more in The UN and Property Rights, © Copyright 1997 Henry Lamb.)
These ‘Stakeholder Councils”, by the way, are unelected Non-Governmental Organisations or NGOs appointed by UN bodies, and they already exist in our local neighbourhoods. Our Global Neighbourhood is the usual oxymoronic twisted doublespeak that comes out of these committees and is propagated throughout the mainstream media by further unelected ‘opinion formers and leaders’ such as Common Purpose.
David Cameron’s Big Society, following as it does Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, is another example of an unelected “Third Way” which is taking over the running of our towns and cities in Britain.
The Water Framework Directive
Baroness Young, whose idea it was to flood the Somerset Levels under the Water Framework Directive without first warning, let alone asking, the people who live there, is typical of this new breed of unelected interfering eugenistist busybodies. As she famously told a House of Lords Select Committee, when questioned her about her intentions for the Somerset Levels:
“To be frank…. if in 2015 we do a survey of the British public and there is even a minor proportion of them who can utter the words Water Framework Directive, I shall put a bullet through my head! It will have been the wrong thing to tell them. We want to tell them about outcomes, not about the processes.”
She was quite right. Once we discovered the processes, we began to figure out what they were really trying to do.
Now that we all know about the Water Framework Directive – not to mention the Habitats Directive, the Environmental Impact Assessment and the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive – we can see that the flooding was the result of deliberate policy, mandated by EU law. In other words, thy were “designer floods”, made to order.
All of these directives are just different measures the EU uses to enable its member states to toe the line of UN control agendas that have the aim of moving people into the “smart cities” that are under the umbrella of 5G technology. Flooding the land is great way to achieve this … and then once the people are moved, and the farmers bankrupted and uninsurable, the land is recovered and then sold on.
I recently heard about massive flooding in Iran from an Iranian man. He told me that in contradistinction to the 70+ fatalities reported by the western media, thousands actually died. He said that the same tactics were used as were employed by the Environment Agency on the Somerset Levels.
Underhand tactics of DEFRA and the Met Office
Between 2010 and 2014, the UK’s Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) offered compensation (well, bribes really) to farmers to get them to cut down their trees. This helped to exacerbate the flooding, because not only do tree roots hold the soil together, but water drains 60 times more quickly from the land when it can flow down tree roots.
DEFRA uses an algorithm to determine which parts of the country receives flood defence funding. For every pound it gives from its central pot, £8.00 of business benefits need to be realised. This calculation ‘just so happens’ to massively favour urban centres like “smart cities” over rural populations
Richard North, the environmental journalist that initially broke the EU connection to the flooding, heard about DEFRA’s underhand tactics from one of his Drainage Board sources.
“To dredge a 1.2-mile section of the Parrett, they got a quote of £7,500. For five miles dredging of the same river, DEFRA claimed it would cost £4 million. By then assessing the economic cost of flooding agricultural land as zero, it is then very easy to show that flood prevention is not “cost effective”.
Then there’s the dishonesty of the Met Office. I hardly know where to begin with all that. Maybe it’s another article, in itself… but here’s just a couple of its more recent attempts to try to manufacture our consent that the flooding is all the fault of “global warming”.
The claims it makes in its recent report called “The Recent Storms and Floods in the UK” would lead one to believe that the waters around Britain were totally independent from the oceans in the rest of the world. The report not only blithely ignores the fact that the climate hasn’t warmed for about 15 years, but it also reckons that said ‘global warming’ will cause the North Sea, the Channel and the Irish Sea to rise three times higher than the seas in the rest of the world by 2030.
From page 21:
“With the warming we are already committed to over the next few decades, a further 11-16cm of sea level rise is likely by 2030. This equates to 23-27cm of total sea level rise since 1900. We are very confident that sea level will continue to rise over coming decades as the planet continues to warm. These numbers represent our current best estimate for the UK.”
Even the Summary for Policymakers, part of the report for the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC), and which is always notoriously in support of the idea of “man-made climate change”, has only managed to squeeze from its computer models a number three times lower than that. The SPM is working on a 3mm rise a year, while our Met Office, in its wisdom, has decided to triple it to 9mm a year.
Added to which, a piece of very good research by consultant hydrologist, Dr Colin Clark, who bases his conclusions on Met Office precipitation figures going back to the 18th century, puts wet and stormy winter of 2014 into perspective and shows that these rains and storms were not that unusual, and more importantly, not linked to air temperature (aka ‘global warming’).
All of this is shine the spotlight away from the real science, so that we don’t realise that the floods were caused by the government’s serious and criminal negligence in failing to maintain anti-flooding infrastructure that had previously worked perfectly well for centuries. Meanwhile, we will have to put up with our seas being three times higher than everyone else’s in the world – and perhaps that why we are one of the few countries that has to pay extortionately high carbon taxes.
Winning hearts and minds through self-hatred
I think it’s time to stop laughing at our politicians and telling each other how “crazy” and “stupid” they are. We can laugh all we like, at their so-called incompetence… and they don’t mind… because they are laughing back at us… all the way to the bank. They are not doing what they tell us they’re doing, which is why we keep yelling at them that they’re going the wrong way. They’re going in exactly the right way that they want to go, towards implementing Agenda 21/30/50, while telling us something else entirely. There is no other reasonable explanation, in my opinion.
They win “hearts and minds” to their cause through guilt and self-hatred, to which our are young people have become quite susceptible – the belief that the Earth needs to be protected from its “enemy”, and that “enemy is man himself”. In this way, those that crafted Agenda 21/30/50 have already set in motion plans to protect themselves from the “enemy” (us) in case we give them any trouble as they begin to implement it.
That’s why there are spiders networks of underground military bunkers underneath many of the major cities. That’s why they want to bring in the Internet of Things so that, as the CIA admitted, our fridges could spy on us.
All of this is there to support the implementation of Agenda 21/30/50, which cannot be stopped unless the United Nations is stopped.
But surely, some will say, the United Nations is sacrosanct … it is our only chance for peace on Earth, which is why this federation of nation states was brought together after the League of Nations failed. We were told that with the United Nations, we will never have to face a war like World War 2 again.
However, have a look at this map of US wars and CIA “interventions” since World War 2.
It doesn’t even include Mozambique, Namibia, and Honduras. But still, this map gives the lie to the urban myth that the world is a more peaceful place since the establishment of the United Nations.
So at the very least, we can clearly see that the United Nations has failed as a peacekeeping body. I can’t even begin to list here the harm to the world that the United Nations has done in other respects, from its subsidiaries like the World Bank and the World Trade Organisation.
So in my opinion, if we really want to stop 5G and the Internet of Things, designer flooding, chemtrails, genetically-modified foods, financial terrorism, biological terrorism, atmospheric terrorism, carbon taxes, false flag events and wars, we need to withdraw our support from efforts engaged in destroying the thousands of talking heads and, instead, concentrate our arrows of dissent on the one belly of the Beast, the nectar pot, aka Agenda 21/30/50 and the United Nations.
Not waving but drowning
Nobody heard him, the dead man,
But still he lay moaning:
I was much further out than you thought
And not waving but drowning.
Poor chap, he always loved larking
And now he’s dead
It must have been too cold for him his heart gave way,
Oh, no no no, it was too cold always
(Still the dead one lay moaning)
I was much too far out all my life
And not waving but drowning.
Please help us to continue supplying you with all the most up-to-date information on health and wellbeing – and also about how it is under attack – by sending us a donation. Just click on this link to go to PayPal. We accept all credit cards.