The lies behind the EU’s transatlantic deal – TTIP

TPPGlobalCorporations
Plans to create an EU-US single market will allow corporations to sue governments using secretive panels, bypassing courts and parliaments – and one of the risks to our health is that biotech companies could, in that way, force UK supermarkets to stock genetically modified (GM) foods.
This article in the Guardian by George Monbiot explains further. At the end, we provide a template letter to send to your local MEP, who we also help you find.

By George Monbiot

Panic spreads through the European commission like ferrets in a rabbit warren. Its plans to create a single market incorporating Europe and the United States, progressing so nicely when hardly anyone knew, have been blown wide open. All over Europe people are asking why this is happening; why we were not consulted; for whom it is being done.

They have good reason to ask. The commission insists that its Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership should include a toxic mechanism called investor-state dispute settlement. Where this has been forced into other trade agreements, it has allowed big corporations to sue governments before secretive arbitration panels composed of corporate lawyers, which bypass domestic courts and override the will of parliaments.

This mechanism could threaten almost any means by which governments might seek to defend their citizens or protect the natural world. Already it is being used by mining companies to sue governments trying to keep them out of protected areas; by banks fighting financial regulation; by a nuclear company contesting Germany’s decision to switch off atomic power. After a big political fight we’ve now been promised plain packaging for cigarettes. But it could be nixed by an offshore arbitration panel. The tobacco company Philip Morris is currently suing Australia through the same mechanism in another treaty.

No longer able to keep this process quiet, the European commission has instead devised a strategy for lying to us. A few days ago an internal document was leaked. This reveals that a “dedicated communications operation” is being “co-ordinated across the commission”. It involves, to use the commission’s chilling phrase, the “management of stakeholders, social media and transparency”. Managing transparency should be adopted as its motto.

The message is that the trade deal is about “delivering growth and jobs” and will not “undermine regulation and existing levels of protection in areas like health, safety and the environment”. Just one problem: it’s not true.


Shop GMO-Free in the UK app

We’re the first to bring out an app containing the GM status of more than 10,000 foods sold in UK supermarkets, Shop GMO-Free in the UK, which you can download for free here!


From the outset, the transatlantic partnership has been driven by corporations and their lobby groups, who boast of being able to “co-write” it. Persistent digging by the Corporate Europe Observatory reveals that the commission has held eight meetings on the issue with civil society groups, and 119 with corporations and their lobbyists. Unlike the civil society meetings, these have taken place behind closed doors and have not been disclosed online.

Though the commission now tells the public that it will protect “the state’s right to regulate”, this isn’t the message the corporations have been hearing. In an interview last week, Stuart Eizenstat, co-chair of the Transatlantic Business Council – instrumental in driving the process – was asked if companies whose products had been banned by regulators would be able to sue. Yes. “If a suit like that was brought and was successful, it would mean that the country banning the product would have to pay compensation to the industry involved or let the product in.” Would that apply to the European ban on chicken carcasses washed with chlorine, a controversial practice permitted in the US? “That’s one example where it might.”

What the commission and its member governments fail to explain is why we need offshore arbitration at all. It insists that domestic courts “might be biased or lack independence”, but which courts is it talking about? It won’t say. Last month, while trying to defend the treaty, the British minister Kenneth Clarke said something revealing: “Investor protection is a standard part of free-trade agreements – it was designed to support businesses investing in countries where the rule of law is unpredictable, to say the least.” So what is it doing in an EU-US deal? Why are we using measures designed to protect corporate interests in failed states in countries with a functioning judicial system? Perhaps it’s because functioning courts are less useful to corporations than opaque and unjust arbitration by corporate lawyers.

As for the commission’s claim that the trade deal will produce growth and jobs, this is also likely to be false. Barack Obama promised that the US-Korea Free Trade Agreement would increase US exports by $10bn. They immediately fell by $3.5bn. The 70,000 jobs it would deliver? Er, 40,000 were lost. Bill Clinton promised that the North American Free Trade Agreement would create 200,000 new jobs for the US; 680,000 went down the pan. As the commentator Glyn Moody says: “The benefits are slight and illusory, while the risks are very real.”

So where are our elected representatives? Fast asleep. Labour MEPs, now frantically trying to keep investor-state dispute mechanisms out of the agreement, are the exception; the rest are in Neverland. The Lib Dem MEP Graham Watson wrote in his newsletter, before dismissing the idea: “I am told that columnists on the Guardian and the Independent claim it will hugely advantage US multinational companies to the detriment of Europe.” We said no such thing, as he would know had he read the articles, rather than idiotically relying on hearsay. The treaty is likely to advantage the corporations of both the US and the EU, while disadvantaging their people. It presents a danger to democracy and public protection throughout the trading area.

Caroline Lucas, one of the few MPs interested in the sovereignty of parliament, has published an early-day motion on the issue. It has so far been signed by seven MPs. For the government, Clarke argues that to ignore the potential economic gains “in favour of blowing up a controversy around one small part of the negotiations, known as investor protection, seems to me positively Scrooge-like”.

Quite right too. Overriding our laws, stripping away our rights, making parliament redundant: these are trivial and irrelevant beside the issue of how much money could be made. Don’t worry your little heads about it.

• This footnote was appended on 16 December. Mr Eizenstat has asked us to make clear that he was not talking about investor-state agreements in the interview and was only referring to the EU obligations if a successful suit was brought under WTO regulations.


Template letter. Send this to your local MEP (Find your local MEP here). Remember to include your full address.

Dear [xxxxxxx],

I would like to object to the fact that the European Commission is lying to us about the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, in that it includes a toxic mechanism called ‘investor-state dispute settlement’.

Where this has been forced into other trade agreements in the past, it has allowed big corporations to sue governments before secretive arbitration panels composed of corporate lawyers, which bypass domestic courts and override the will of parliaments.

This mechanism could threaten almost any means by which governments might seek to defend their citizens or protect the natural world … for instance, in Britain, supermarkets could be forced to accept GM foods.

This mechanism has already been used by mining companies to sue governments trying to keep them out of protected areas, by banks fighting financial regulation and by a nuclear company contesting Germany’s decision to switch off atomic power.

The European commission has devised a strategy for lying to us about this. Last December, an internal document was leaked which revealed that a “dedicated communications operation” is being “co-ordinated across the commission”, involving the “management of stakeholders, social media and transparency”.

Only a few (Labour) MEPs have woken up to the dangers of TTIP, but the rest don’t seem to understand the dangers it would present to democracy and public protection throughout the trading area. It will also ride roughshod over our laws, stripping away our rights, and make our  parliament redundant.

As my elected representative in Brussels, I’m asking you to stand firm against this trade agreement, or at least to ask for the withdrawal of the investor-state dispute settlement.

Thank you,

Yours sincerely,


 

Shop GMO-Free in the UK app

We’re the first to bring out an app containing the GM status of more than 10,000 foods sold in UK supermarkets, Shop GMO-Free in the UK, which you can download for free here!


The top article was originally published last December in the Guardian.

17 comments

  1. Pingback: These fruits and veggies will help you lose weight | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  2. Pingback: UN conference attempts to force adoption of GM crops and livestock | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  3. Pingback: “How GM food makes us sick”, by former pro-GM agri-scientist | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  4. Pingback: Nuclear chemist finds cause of explosion of diseases worldwide is chemtrails made up of toxic coal ash | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  5. Pingback: Nuclear chemist finds cause of explosion of diseases worldwide are chemtrails made up of toxic coal ash | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  6. Pingback: The hijacking of the Green agenda over Hinckley Point | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  7. Pingback: TTIP will bring GM foods flooding into our shops, and they won’t be labelled | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  8. Pingback: How to Cancel the Earth’s Sixth Great Mass Extinction | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  9. Pingback: The Inexorable Silent Tip-Toe Creep of Fascist Federal Tyranny | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  10. Pingback: The War on DNA | Ishtar Babilu Dingir
  11. Pingback: Secret emails reveal how UK ministers plotted with the GM lobbyists to bring GM foods into the UK | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  12. Pingback: New study proves that GMOs fed to animals can jump species into humans who eat them | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  13. Pingback: Organic farmers are struggling in the US, against GM onslaught | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  14. Pingback: Regain our food sovereignty in the UK with the new Shop GMO-Free app | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  15. Pingback: Regain your food sovereignty in the UK with our new Shop GMO-Free app | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  16. Pingback: Monsanto GM corn causes tumours in rats | THE HOLISTIC WORKS
  17. Pingback: GMO-Science Takes a Blow as Studies Are Retracted | THE HOLISTIC WORKS

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s