The Great GMO Food Labeling Fight: What Now?

Twenty-two years after the controversial introduction of GMOs (genetically modified organisms) into the U.S. food supply, with no independent safety testing nor labeling required, a critical mass of Americans1 have made it clear that they want to know whether the food they are eating contains genetically engineered (GE) ingredients.

Another significant segment, organic and natural health consumers, have made it clear that, given a choice, they will refuse to buy GMO-tainted foods, spending approximately $55 billion a year on foods labeled as “organic,” “non-GMO,” or “100 percent grass-fed.”

After several hard-fought, heavily publicized ballot initiatives in California (2012), Washington (2013), and Oregon (2014), and attempts to pass mandatory GMO labeling in 30 states, Vermont passed a labeling law in May 2014 that is due to go into effect on July 1,2016.

Maine and Connecticut have also passed mandatory labeling laws, but these will not go into effect until additional New England states pass similar legislation.

The pending implementation of the Vermont labeling law has provoked panic among Monsanto and major food corporations, and their trade association, the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA).

This is understandable, given that 75 percent of processed foods in grocery stores contain unlabeled GMOs and the toxic pesticide residues that always accompany GMOs.

The Battle Continues for Mandatory Labeling

The GMO industry and Big Food understand that they cannot just label their processed foods and beverages as containing GMOs (or else reformulate them to remove GMOs) only in Vermont, while failing to do so in other states and markets in North America.

This would be a public relations disaster. They also understand that once their GMO-tainted foods are labeled, they will lose billions of dollars in sales to organic, non-GMO, and grass-fed brands.

In desperation, Monsanto, Coca-Cola, General Mills, Pepsi, Kellogg’s and the GMA turned to Congress to preempt or nullify the Vermont law.

In July 2015, they convinced 275 of their faithful servants in the House of Representatives to pass the highly unpopular H.R. 1599,2 a bill introduced by Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan). This bill is colloquially known as the DARK Act (Deny Americans the Right to Know).

In the wake of a nationwide consumer backlash, led by networks including the Organic Consumers Association,, Dr. Bronner’s, Food Democracy Now, Center for Food Safety and others, the Pompeo bill stalled out before reaching the Senate.

However, pro-GMO politicians from both parties are still desperately trying to come up with deceptive Senate legislation that will placate industry, by keeping consumers in the dark about whether or not the food they are eating is contaminated with GMOs, while pretending to respect consumers’ right to know and state’s rights to regulate GMOs.

In December, Monsanto and the GMA threatened to attach a back-door rider to a federal appropriations bill.

The rider, which would have voided Vermont’s law and outlawed mandatory labeling, failed, mainly due to consumer pressure, including literally hundreds of thousands of emails, phone calls and in-person meetings with Congress members.

If you’re in the UK, get our free app with the GM status of thousands of foods

Shop GMO-Free in the UK app

We’re the first to bring out an app containing the GM status of more than 10,000 foods sold in UK supermarkets, Shop GMO-Free in the UK, which you can download for free.

Download app for Shop GMO-Free in the UK


QR Codes Are NOT an Adequate Substitute for Package Labels

Food companies are running out of time before they have to label or reformulate their products to comply with the Vermont law.

So, the Food Giants and the USDA are now floating a new, highly controversial scheme3 to substitute voluntary QR bar codes for mandatory on-package labels — in a federal bill that would preempt Vermont’s law.

Unfortunately for industry and Monsanto, 90 percent of consumers4 have made it clear that smart phones and QR bar codes are no substitute for the on-package labels that are now required in nearly every industrialized country in the world, except the U.S. and Canada.

High Profile Food Companies on Board With Labeling

Health-conscious consumers in North America are especially angry about the fact that the same large food corporations in the U.S. that have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to stop GMO labeling laws have removed all GMOs from the foods  they sell in Europe, where mandatory labeling is required.

Meanwhile a number of high-profile food  companies and brands have broken ranks with Monsanto and the GMA, either saying they are removing GMOs from their products (Hershey’s, Hellmann’s Mayonnaise, Cheerios, Chipotle’s, Panera, Ben and Jerry’s); or else pledging they will voluntarily label all of their products (Campbell’s) as the Vermont law requires.

Campbell’s further undermined the industry’s major argument against labeling (i.e. that it will raise food prices) by saying that all of their hundreds of products containing GMOs will be labeled, with no increase in cost.5

Concerns Over Glyphosate Have Turned Out to Be Valid

Fueling consumer demands for GMO labeling or bans, the well-respected International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the research arm of the World Health Organization (WHO) published a report6 in March 2015, declaring  Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide (active agent glyphosate), sprayed heavily on 85 percent of all GMO crops, including soy, corn, cotton, canola, and sugar beets, a “probable carcinogen.”

In addition, many independent studies7 have shown that GMOs and the toxic chemicals that always accompany them are hazardous to humans, animals, bees, soil, biodiversity, soil health, and climate stability.

Consumer concern in the U.S. has forced the nation’s largest organic and natural food chain, Whole Foods Market (WFM), to pledge that all foods in their stores will have to be labeled by 2018 if they contain GMOs. This labeling policy includes meat, eggs, dairy, nutritional supplements, and take-out items.

Although this policy will affect only the 40,000 or so food products sold in WFM stores, brands selling to Whole Foods will suffer a public relations disaster if they are forced to label their items in WFM as GMO-tainted, but then refuse to do so in other stores.

Other natural food retailers, such as the Natural Grocer, have also announced8 that they are removing GMO and GMO-derived foods from their stores. These developments leave industry and their indentured politicians in Washington facing a major dilemma.

How can they continue to serve their major paymasters, corporate agribusiness, genetic engineering companies, Big Food/Junk Food brands, and Big Pharma (who supply the drugs for GMO-dependent factory farms), without antagonizing millions of consumers/voters in an election year?

Demand Mandatory Labeling —TAKE ACTION NOW

So what happens next?

Over the next few weeks or months, the Senate and the White House will either respect consumer choice and state’s rights to legislate on food safety and food labels, and allow the Vermont law go into effect, or they can slap millions of health- and environmental-minded consumers in the face by passing a law or a rider that preempts Vermont’s law and keeps consumers in the dark.

Please sign the petition to Congress, asking them to respect your right to know whether your food has been laced with GMOs and the toxic chemicals that go along with them.

If you’re in the UK, get our free app for the GM status of thousands of foods

Shop GMO-Free in the UK app

We’re the first to bring out an app containing the GM status of more than 10,000 foods sold in UK supermarkets, Shop GMO-Free in the UK, which you can download for free.

Download app for Shop GMO-Free in the UK

Thanks to Dr Mercola for this article