The true origins and make-up of the coronavirus

I’ve published several articles about how to use nutrition to build up your immune system to protect against the coronavirus. But now that a paper trail of hard evidence is coming out about the origins and make-up of the coronavirus – such as Chinese scientific papers published in respected journals* and the admissions of brave Chinese scientist whistleblowers – my thinking is now leading me to agree with governmental advice that the only real protection is to stay at home … for now.

I know there are some who, quite understandably, are worried that we are giving away freedoms that may never be reinstated, such as being able to refuse vaccinations. And yes, there will always be those who “never let a good crisis go to waste.” However, that’s all about correlation; correlation is not causation. And so long as our attention is  taken up with watching these side events, we are not looking the cause straight in the face. I believe we need to do that if we are to  survive.   

It is true that we are at war against an invisible enemy – but those who are responsible for its invasion are actually quite visible.

If you look in respected science journals*, you will find clear evidence of experiments that have been going on for decades to produce this particular virus – and which explain its virulence and also why it attacks young, healthy people.

It is what scientists term a “recombination event” which is manufactured in a laboratory.

This novel coronavirus it is actually a cut-and-paste splice of two different, previously isolated, horseshoe bat-derived viruses sampled in Zhoushan, an eastern Chinese city in the province of Zhejiang, by members of the People’s Liberation Army, and then brought to Wuhan.

These two bat-derived viruses were already known to cause respiratory and cardiac diseases in mice. Then they were inserted into a third component: an HIV envelope, which explains the huge auto-immune response.

There are also mushroom-like receptors on its surface, called “spike glycoproteins” – S-proteins for short. These weaponise the virus to be able to penetrate humans much more easily than any naturally occurring virus. They are, in fact, what has caused this “recombination event” to cross the animal-human barrier and to be so virulent.

The S proteins are like keys that unlock the lock on the cell surface and then invade into the cell to propagate and destroy it.

In April 2020, Professor Luc Montagnier, the French scientist who shared the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine for discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), added his voice to those who believe the new coronavirus was created in a laboratory. Interviewed on the CNews channel in France, Montagnier asserted that the virus had been designed by molecular biologists. Stating that it contains genetic elements of HIV, he insisted its characteristics could not have arisen naturally.

Asked by the CNews interviewer what the goal of these molecular biologists was, Montagnier said it wasn’t clear. “My job,” he said, “is to expose the facts.” While stressing that he didn’t know who had done it, or why, Montagnier suggested that possibly the goal had been to make an AIDS vaccine. Labeling the virus as “a professional job…a very meticulous job,” he described its genome as being a “clockwork of sequences.”

“There’s a part which is obviously the classic virus, and there’s another mainly coming from the bat, but that part has added sequences, particularly from HIV – the AIDS virus,” he said.

Montagnier also pointed out that he wasn’t the first scientist to assert that the coronavirus was created in a laboratory. Previously, on 31 January 2020, a research group from India had published a paper suggesting that aspects of the virus bore an “uncanny similarity” to HIV. Taken together, the researchers said their findings suggested the virus had an “unconventional evolution” and that further investigation was warranted. While the researchers subsequently retracted their paper, Montagnier said they had been “forced” to do so.

Who is suspected of developing a bio-weapon in Wuhan?

The scientific work to produce what could turn out to be bio-weapon was initially begun in Canada and America, and it was led by a Chinese woman named Shi Zhengli.

Shi Zhengli

Shi Zhengli has has been quite open and prolific in writing about her work, and to where it has been leading, in a collaborative effort with Dr Ralph Baric, a virologist at the University of North Carolina.

However, once the aims of the work became clear, in 2014, the Obama administration decided to shut it down by defunding it. So then Shi Zhengli took all that work to the Wuhan lab in Hubei province of China, where she continued to develop it as described above.

It is only now emerging [May 2020] that in December 2017, the money streams started flowing from American government departments again. The National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the organisation led by the controversial Dr Anthony Fauci, sent the Wuhan lab funding specifically for work on bat coronaviruses. U.S. taxpayers money was also sent to the Wuhan lab from the Pentagon and the National Institutes for Health.

Shi Zhengli has been quite frank about her desire to test her viruses on primates and there are published scientific papers on her work with rhesus monkey. She may have been only wanting to experiment on primates in-vitro, we don’t know. We do know that this bio-weapon has now gone in-vivo and the whole world is her petri dish.

We could have given the Chinese Communist Party the benefit of the doubt and considered it an accidental leak if it weren’t for the continual lies and cover-ups, in league with the World Health Organisation, which history will judge, in the final analysis, to be responsible for the deaths of more than three million across the world and the destruction of the economies of nearly 200 countries.

Our governments can’t say all this directly because they are all tied up in Chinese knots to do with diplomacy and trade. The Chinese Communist Party has been hoarding masks and ventilators and will only sell them to other countries in exchange for favours, like Huawei being given the contract for installing 5G infrastructure.

The UK and other European countries are way behind in testing because they bought in millions of test kits from the Chinese, which mostly didn’t work. Hopefully, once American testing kits, recently put into production,  go into surplus, they will sell them to the rest of the world.

So I’m afraid that, for now, only keeping up the self isolation and social distancing can prevent this bio-weapon with its S protein keys jumping from one human to another.  And when we do eventually get back to something like normality, we will still have to be careful in how we go about our work and our lives for some time to come.

At least the good news is that there are lots of new therapeutics being developed, such as hydroxy chloroquine. As they always say, necessity is the mother of invention. I have high hopes in this case.

* References

I have supplied all the links to the scientific papers used to build this case in the following further article: The Scientific Evidence for How the Coronavirus has been Weaponised.

Both articles use information gleaned from a documentary by the chief investigative reporter of the Epoch Times, Joshua Philipp. You can watch the whole thing here: